MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154332623 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2008.4761091

Help-training for semi-supervised discriminative classifiers. Application to SVM

2008· article· en· W2154332623 on OpenAlexafffund
Mathias M. Adankon, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDiscriminative modelArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineComputer scienceCo-trainingMachine learningClassifier (UML)Generative grammarPattern recognition (psychology)Training setSemi-supervised learningRandom subspace methodLabeled dataSupervised learningTraining (meteorology)Artificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose to reinforce self-training strategy by using a generative classifier that may help the main discriminative classifier training in semi-supervised mode to label the unlabeled data. We called this semi-supervised strategy: help-training. We apply this method for training support vector machine with labeled and unlabeled data. Experimental results on both artificial and real problems show its usefulness comparing with other classical semi-supervised methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.160
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern RecognitionSame topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207