La participation du Parlement européen au contentieux communautaire: indice de sa position institutionnelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Parlement européen, institution des Communautés européennes encore peu connue du grand public il y a seulement une décennie, bénéficie aujourd'hui d'un impact certain auprès des 270 millions d'européens qui y sont représentés et même d'une autorité non négligeable auprès de la communauté internationale. Cette notoriété nouvelle est le résultat d'une évolution tranquille de traités commerciaux internationaux, certes plus élaborés que d'ordinaire, tendant aujourd'hui vers une unification « constitutionnelle » de l'Europe des douze États qui la composent. C'est un des aspects de cette évolution que tente de mettre en lumièrre cette étude en droit « constitutionnel » communautaire axée sur la reconnaissance du droit d'ester en justice du Parlement européen. Cette reconnaissance est le moyen pour ce dernier d'accéder à une position institutionnelle plus favorable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".