MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154384227 · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2008.05.065

The Role of Pertussis Booster Vaccinations in Adolescents and Adults

2008· article· en· W2154384227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David R. Johnson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBordetella pertussisPediatricsVaccinationWhooping coughDiphtheriaBooster doseTetanusPertussis vaccinePneumoniaHerd immunityImmunologyImmunizationInternal medicineImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In most developed countries, long-standing vaccination programs for infants and young children have led to substantial decreases in pertussis disease since their introduction in the 1940s. More recently, however, there has been a resurgence of pertussis case reports, most notably among adolescents and adults. Immunity from childhood pertussis vaccinations wanes after several years, but natural boosting through repeated subclinical infection is now uncommon; most adolescents and adults are again susceptible to pertussis. Manifestations of pertussis in these age groups are highly variable, ranging from mild symptoms unlikely to prompt medical care through typical whooping cough. Complications are common and include sleep deprivation, school and work disruptions, rib fractures, and pneumonia. Adolescents and adults not only experience substantial morbidity and complications from pertussis, they play an important role in transmission of Bordetella pertussis to children. Multiple studies have documented that parents and other family members are the main source of pertussis infection in infants. Of particular concern are very young infants, who are at greatest risk for hospitalization and mortality from pertussis, and who are either incompletely vaccinated or unvaccinated. To address these concerns, adolescent/adult-formulation tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines, sometimes combined with injectable polio vaccine, have been developed. These Tdap vaccines have been shown in clinical trials to be safe and at least as immunogenic against pertussis as their analogous pediatric vaccines. In Canada and the US, Tdap vaccination is recommended for all adolescents and adults < 64 years of age. Emphasis is placed on vaccinating young adolescents and on vaccinating adults (eg, new parents, child-care workers, and certain healthcare-personnel) who have close contact with infants. Canadian experience suggests that Tdap vaccine usage has contributed to further decreases in pertussis. Full control of this disease, however, may require decennial boosting with Tdap vaccine, which is currently under study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207