Noxa mediates bortezomib induced apoptosis in both sensitive and intrinsically resistant mantle cell lymphoma cells and this effect is independent of constitutive activity of the AKT and NF-<b>kappa</b>B pathways
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bortezomib is more active against mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) than against most other lymphoma subtypes. Nevertheless, up to half of patients with MCL have bortezomib resistant disease. Factors contributing to intrinsic resistance to bortezomib have not been determined. Here we used a panel of eight bortezomib sensitive (median IC(50) 5.9 nM) and three relatively bortezomib resistant cell lines (median IC(50) 12.9 nM) to investigate differences in tumor biology that could determine sensitivity to bortezomib. Bortezomib effectively inhibited high baseline proteasome activity and induced a comparable degree of proteasome inhibition in both sensitive and resistant cells. At 10 nM, bortezomib induced the proapoptotic BH3-only protein Noxa in sensitive but not resistant cells. At higher concentrations of bortezomib, however, Noxa was also upregulated in resistant cells and this effect was sufficient to induce apoptosis. Silencing of Noxa with siRNA rescued these cells from apoptosis, arguing against a defect in Noxa regulation or function as the basis of bortezomib resistance. Bortezomib was equally effective against cells with high and low constitutive NF-kappaB signaling. Also, sensitive and resistant MCL cell lines showed comparable activation of the AKT pathway. We conclude that bortezomib can overcome classic mechanisms of resistance to apoptosis and that determinants of bortezomib sensitivity in MCL are due to differences in signaling or stress pathways upstream of Noxa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it