Postoperative Reversal of Complete (Monocular) Blindness in Skull Base Meningioma: Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Meningiomas of the anterior cranial fossa frequently present with impaired visual function. Recognition of this entity in the differential diagnosis of painless, progressive, and asymmetric optic neuropathy is important since reversal of visual loss is possible given timely surgical excision of the tumour. METHODS: A 76-year-old man presented with no perception of light in his right eye and a reduced visual acuity of 20/60 in his left eye with a markedly constricted visual field. His visual deterioration had progressed over the previous three months and was not associated with headache. Ophthalmoscopy showed normal optic discs. MRI scanning showed a large frontal basal meningioma, which was subsequently resected. RESULTS: The patient noticed an immediate improvement in his vision in his right eye. Visual acuity in his right eye improved to 20/50 at six weeks postoperatively and to 20/25 at five months, with corresponding improvement of the visual field. CONCLUSION: Complete monocular blindness due to tumour compressing or distorting the anterior visual pathways does not preclude recovery following timely decompressive surgery, especially when the appearance of the optic disc is normal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".