MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154448185 · doi:10.1017/s0269964813000107

ON A CLASS OF GENERALIZED MARSHALL–OLKIN BIVARIATE DISTRIBUTIONS AND SOME RELIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS

2013· article· en· W2154448185 on OpenAlexaff
Ramesh C. Gupta, S. N. U. A. Kirmani, N. Balakrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueProbability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBivariate analysisMathematicsClass (philosophy)StatisticsMonotonic functionMarginal distributionApplied mathematicsJoint probability distributionMathematical analysisRandom variableComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider here a general class of bivariate distributions from reliability point of view, and refer to it as generalized Marshall–Olkin bivariate distributions. This class includes as special cases the Marshall–Olkin bivariate exponential distribution and the class of bivariate distributions studied recently by Sarhan and Balakrishnan [25]. For this class, the reliability, survival, hazard, and mean residual life functions are all derived, and their monotonicity is discussed for the marginal as well as the conditional distributions. These functions are also studied for the series and parallel systems based on this bivariate distribution. Finally, the Clayton association measure for this bivariate model is derived in terms of the hazard gradient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProbability in the Engineering and Informational SciencesSame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207