MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154465989 · doi:10.1109/tns.2002.805368

Gamma enhancement of proton-induced SEE cross section in a CMOS SRAM

2002· article· en· W2154465989 on OpenAlex
Lorne Erhardt, D.S. Haslip, T. Cousins, R. Buhr, D. Estan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
FundersTRIUMF
KeywordsProtonStatic random-access memoryCMOSIrradiationPhysicsCross section (physics)Random access memoryNuclear physicsMaterials scienceRadiochemistryElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineeringChemistryComputer scienceComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CMOS SRAM parts (NEC 431000ACZ-70L) were tested for possible combined effects of gamma and proton irradiation. The parts were irradiated with a /sup 60/Co source to a variety of doses and at different dose rates. These parts were subsequently subjected to identical tests for proton-induced single-event effects (SEES). The cross section for proton-induced SEES increased with the prior /sup 60/Co dose and also showed an enhancement at lower dose rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it