MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154486258 · doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0286

Steady electrical and micro-rheological response functions for uncharged colloidal inclusions in polyelectrolyte hydrogels

2009· article· en· W2154486258 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrostatics and Colloid Interactions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteElectric fieldPolyelectrolyteColloidRheologySelf-healing hydrogelsChemical physicsChemistryMaterials scienceAqueous solutionParticle (ecology)Displacement (psychology)PolymerMechanicsComposite materialPolymer chemistryPhysicsElectrodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electric-field-induced response of an uncharged colloidal sphere embedded in a quenched polyelectrolyte hydrogel is calculated from a model where the polymer network is treated as an elastic, porous skeleton saturated with an aqueous electrolyte. We present exact analytical solutions for the steady response to a uniform electric field, as well as the steady susceptibility, defined as the ratio of the particle displacement to the strength of an optical or magnetic force. Even though the particle is uncharged, it attains a finite electric-field-induced displacement owing to hydrodynamic coupling with electroosmotic flow. The steady susceptibility decreases with increasing charge and decreasing electrolyte concentration; in general, charge imparts a small correction to the classical theory for an uncharged linearly elastic continuum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it