MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154493748 · doi:10.1310/6aum-etyw-q8xv-8xac

Plasticity and Reorganization of the Brain Post Stroke

2005· review· en· W2154493748 on OpenAlex
Robert Teasell, Nestor A. Bayona, Jamie Bitensky

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalSt Joseph's Health Care
FundersCanadian Stroke NetworkHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsStroke (engine)LesionNeuroscienceMotor cortexNeuroplasticityCortex (anatomy)Lateralization of brain functionRight hemispherePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyMedicineSurgeryStimulationCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reorganization of the cortex post stroke is dependent not only on the lesion site but also on remote brain areas that have structural connections with the area damaged by the stroke. Motor recovery is largely dependent on the intact cortex adjacent to the infarct, which points out the importance of preserving the penumbral areas. There appears to be a priority setting with contralateral and ipsilateral motor pathways, with ipsilateral (unaffected hemisphere) pathways only becoming prominent after more severe strokes where functional contralateral (affected hemisphere) pathways are unable to recover. Ipsilateral or unaffected hemisphere motor pathway activation is therefore associated with a worse prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.810

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it