MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154493748 · doi:10.1310/6aum-etyw-q8xv-8xac

Plasticity and Reorganization of the Brain Post Stroke

2005· review· en· W2154493748 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert Teasell, Nestor A. Bayona, Jamie Bitensky

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Stroke Rehabilitation · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalSt Joseph's Health Care
FundersCanadian Stroke NetworkHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsStroke (engine)LesionNeuroscienceMotor cortexNeuroplasticityCortex (anatomy)Lateralization of brain functionRight hemispherePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyMedicineSurgeryStimulationCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reorganization of the cortex post stroke is dependent not only on the lesion site but also on remote brain areas that have structural connections with the area damaged by the stroke. Motor recovery is largely dependent on the intact cortex adjacent to the infarct, which points out the importance of preserving the penumbral areas. There appears to be a priority setting with contralateral and ipsilateral motor pathways, with ipsilateral (unaffected hemisphere) pathways only becoming prominent after more severe strokes where functional contralateral (affected hemisphere) pathways are unable to recover. Ipsilateral or unaffected hemisphere motor pathway activation is therefore associated with a worse prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations130
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Stroke RehabilitationSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207