Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As modern operating systems become more complex, understanding their inner workings is increasingly difficult. Dynamic kernel instrumentation is a well established method of obtaining insight into the workings of an OS, with applications including debugging, profiling and monitoring, and security auditing. To date, all dynamic instrumentation systems for operating systems follow the probe-based instrumentation paradigm. While efficient on fixed-length instruction set architectures, probes are extremely expensive on variable-length ISAs such as the popular Intel x86 and AMD x86-64. We propose using just-in-time (JIT) instrumentation to overcome this problem. While common in user space, JIT instrumentation has not until now been attempted in kernel space. In this work, we show the feasibility and desirability of kernel-based JIT instrumentation for operating systems with our novel prototype, implemented as a Linux kernel module. The prototype is fully SMP capable. We evaluate our prototype against the popular Kprobes Linux instrumentation tool. Our prototype outperforms Kprobes, at both micro and macro levels, by orders of magnitude when applying medium- and fine-grained instrumentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it