MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154568047 · doi:10.1080/02713680500246957

20:5n-3 but not 22:6n-3 is a Preferred Substrate for Synthesis of n-3 Very-Long- Chain Fatty Acids (C<sub>24</sub>–C<sub>36</sub>) in Retina

2005· article· en· W2154568047 on OpenAlexafffund
Miyoung Suh, M. Thomas Clandinin

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Eye Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMetabolismRetinaIn vivoLipid metabolismFatty acidRetinalBiochemistrySubstrate (aquarium)Long chainChemistryBiologyBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to determine if 20:5n-3 or 22:6n-3 is the primary precursor of very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs; C24-C36) synthesized in retina. Rats were fed semisynthetic, nutritionally complete diet containing 20% (w/w) fat with 3% (w/w) of 22:6n-3. After 6 weeks feeding, the vitreal fluid of each eye was injected with [3H]20:5n-3 or [3H]22:6n-3. Rats were then maintained under constant light (330 lux) or dark conditions for 48 hr. After 48 hr in vivo metabolism, the amount of label present in individual fatty acids was determined in major phospholipids in retina. For [3H]22:6n-3, 90% of total incorporation remained in 22:6n-3, whereas for [3H]20:5n-3 the label was actively incorporated into pentaenoic and hexaenoic VLCFAs up to 34 carbon chain length. 22:5n-3 derived from [3H]20:5n-3 was among the most highly labeled fatty acids. These observations suggest that 22:6n-3 is incorporated directly into retinal phospholipids without further metabolism, whereas 20:5n-3 and 22:5n-3 are metabolically active precursors for synthesis of VLCFAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Eye ResearchSame topicEicosanoids and Hypertension PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207