MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154615256 · doi:10.1109/mmsp.2004.1436537

Low-complexity video noise reduction in wavelet domain

2005· article· en· W2154615256 on OpenAlex
Neelesh Gupta, M.N.S. Swamy, E.I. Plotkin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletDecorrelationWavelet packet decompositionComputer scienceSecond-generation wavelet transformStationary wavelet transformArtificial intelligenceNoise reductionWavelet transformComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel spatio-temporal filter for video denoising that operates entirely in the wavelet domain and is based on temporal decorrelation. For effective noise reduction, the spatial and the temporal redundancies, which exist in the wavelet domain representation of a video signal, are exploited. Using simple and closed form expressions, the temporal information in the wavelet domain is first decorrelated in order to minimize the redundancy. The decorrelated noise-free coefficients are then modeled using a generalized Gaussian prior. For spatial filtering of the noisy wavelet coefficients, a new, low-complexity wavelet shrinkage method, which utilizes the correlation that exists between subsequent resolution levels, is proposed. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme outperforms state-of-the-art spatio-temporal filters in time and wavelet domains, both in terms of PSNR and visual quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207