MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154620976 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2003.1199900

Wideband array signal processing using MCMC methods

2004· article· en· W2154620976 on OpenAlexaff
William Ng, J.P. Reilly, T. Kirubarajan

Bibliographic record

Venue2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03). · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaximum a posteriori estimationMarkov chain Monte CarloReversible-jump Markov chain Monte CarloRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceWidebandCramér–Rao boundAlgorithmBayesian probabilityMonte Carlo methodArray processingA priori and a posterioriSignal processingEstimation theoryMaximum likelihoodMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel wideband structure for array signal processing. The method lends itself well to a Bayesian approach for jointly estimating the model order (number of sources) and the DOA through a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure. The source amplitudes are estimated through a maximum a posteriori (MAP) procedure. Advantages of the proposed method include joint detection of model order and estimation of the DOA parameters, and the fact that meaningful results can be obtained using fewer observations than previous methods. The DOA estimation performance of the proposed method is compared with the theoretical Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for this problem. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03).Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207