The pharmacokinetics of etanercept in patients with end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inflammation is strongly associated with malnutrition and cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic renal failure on haemodialysis (HD). The acute-phase inflammatory response, defined by the increased synthesis of positive acute-phase proteins, is stimulated by the production of such cytokines as interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 1 (IL-1) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha TNF-alpha The availability of cytokine antagonists allows testing of the hypothesis that suppression of inflammation reverses the malnutrition-inflammation syndrome in HD patients. Etanercept is a soluble TNF-alpha receptor fusion protein used to suppress inflammation in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Its metabolism in HD patients is unknown. In a study designed to test the safety and pharmacokinetics of etanercept in HD patients, etanercept was administered to six HD patients with albumin levels above 4.2 g dL(-1) and C-reactive protein levels <5 mg L(-1) (five men, one woman, age range 34-59 years). Etanercept (25 mg) was administered subcutaneously twice weekly immediately after dialysis for 13-16 weeks. Etanercept concentrations were measured pre- and post-dialysis by ELISA. Concentrations were compared graphically to assess whether, firstly, dialysis affects etanercept apparent clearance and, secondly, etanercept kinetics were similar between HD patients and the more extensively studied psoriasis population with normal renal function (PS). The second stage examined model-based parameter predictions of the terminal elimination rate constant (k) for HD patients. Steady-state etanercept levels were comparable between HD and PS patients. Treatment with HD had no effect on etanercept levels. When etanercept was discontinued, the terminal rate constant for HD patients was not significantly different from that observed in PS patients. No adverse effects were noted during the 3-month treatment phase and subsequent 6-month follow-up. Albumin and C-reactive protein levels did not change in these non-inflamed patients during the study period. The pharmacokinetics of etanercept in patients with chronic renal failure on HD are similar to patients with normal renal function. It is, therefore, feasible to administer etanercept to HD patients without adjusting the dose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".