MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154660298 · doi:10.1136/pgmj.2009.080630

Primary immunodeficiency diseases: a practical guide for clinicians

2009· review· en· W2154660298 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePostgraduate Medical Journal · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary immunodeficiencyMedicineImmunodeficiencyImmune systemImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesMalignancyDysfunctional familyDiseaseImmunologyIntensive care medicineAutoimmunityHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PediatricsInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs) are genetically determined disorders of the immune system resulting in greatly enhanced susceptibility to infectious disease, autoimmunity and malignancy. While individual PIDs are rare, as a group, it is estimated that between 1:2000 and 1:10 000 live births are affected by a PID. Moreover, PIDs can present at any age from birth to adulthood, posing a considerable challenge for the practising physician to know when and how to work-up a patient for a possible immune defect. In this review, we outline the basic organisation of the human immune system and the types of infections that occur when elements of the immune system are dysfunctional. Importantly, we provide practical guidelines for identifying patients who should be referred for assessment of possible immunodeficiency and an overview of screening investigations and effective therapeutic options available for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it