Projet familial, infertilité et désir d’enfant : usages et expériences de la procréation médicalement assistée en contexte québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les couples qui rencontrent des problèmes d’infertilité et qui cherchent une solution pour leur désir d’enfant se tournent pour la plupart vers la médecine reproductive, celle-ci faisant office d’autorité quant aux questions relatives à la grossesse et à la reproduction. La valorisation de l’enfant, tant sur le plan social qu’au sein de la conjugalité, intervient dans le vécu relatif à l’infertilité et influence le regard que posent les couples sur les nouvelles technologies reproductives. À ce titre, l’étude des relations entre les médecins et les couples infertiles met en évidence les différents discours qui circulent sur la reproduction et fait aussi état des débats et enjeux liés au développement des techniques reproductives et à leur accès grandissant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".