MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154690985 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4479

Cutting Edge: Dendritic Cell Actin Cytoskeletal Polarization during Immunological Synapse Formation Is Highly Antigen-Dependent

2003· article· en· W2154690985 on OpenAlexaff
Monther Al‐Alwan, Robert Liwski, S. M. Mansour Haeryfar, William H. Baldridge, David W. Hoskin, Geoffrey Rowden, Kenneth A. West

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytoskeletonImmunological synapseCell biologyActinT cellMHC class IICell polarityMHC class IBiologyActin cytoskeletonT-cell receptorChemistryAntigenMajor histocompatibility complexCellImmunologyImmune systemBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dendritic cells (DC) actively rearrange their actin cytoskeleton to participate in formation of the immunological synapse (IS). In this study, we evaluated the requirements for DC participation in the IS. DC rearrange their actin cytoskeleton toward naive CD4(+) T cells only in the presence of specific MHC-peptide complexes. In contrast, naive CD4(+) T cells polarized their cytoskeletal proteins in the absence of Ag. DC cytoskeletal rearrangement occurred at the same threshold of peptide-MHC complexes as that required for T cell activation. Furthermore, T cell activation was inhibited by specific blockade of DC cytoskeletal rearrangement. When TCR-MHC interaction was bypassed by using Con A-activated T cells, DC polarization was abrogated. In addition, directional ligation of MHC class II resulted in DC cytoskeletal polarization. Our findings suggest that a high Ag specificity is required for DC IS formation and that MHC class II signaling plays a central role in this process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207