A short term education intervention but not peer discussion improved vitality and pain in women with breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helgeson VS, Cohen S, Schulz R , et al. Long-term effects of educational and peer discussion group interventions on adjustment to breast cancer. Health Psychol2001 Sep; 20 : 387 –92 [OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] QUESTIONS: In women with breast cancer, are the positive effects of a short term education intervention maintained over time? Does a peer discussion intervention have positive effects ≥1 year later? Randomised (unclear allocation concealment; unclear if blinded) controlled trial with a mean follow up of 40 months. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 312 women who were 27–75 years of age (mean age 48 y, 93% Caucasian), had breast cancer (National Cancer Institute criteria stage I: 25%; stage II: 69%; and stage III: 6%), and had been treated by surgery (68% lumpectomy, 32% mastectomy) and adjuvant chemotherapy. Follow up was 83%. Women were allocated to education (n=79), peer discussion (n=74), education plus peer discussion (n=82), or control (n=77), approximately 3 months after diagnosis. Each group comprised 7 small groups of 8–12 women. Education consisted of 8 weekly 45 minute meetings … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DHealth%2Bpsychology%2B%253A%2B%2Bofficial%2Bjournal%2Bof%2Bthe%2BDivision%2Bof%2BHealth%2BPsychology%252C%2BAmerican%2BPsychological%2BAssociation%26rft.stitle%253DHealth%2BPsychol%26rft.aulast%253DHelgeson%26rft.auinit1%253DV.%2BS.%26rft.volume%253D20%26rft.issue%253D5%26rft.spage%253D387%26rft.epage%253D392%26rft.atitle%253DLong-term%2Beffects%2Bof%2Beducational%2Band%2Bpeer%2Bdiscussion%2Bgroup%2Binterventions%2Bon%2Badjustment%2Bto%2Bbreast%2Bcancer.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1037%252F0278-6133.20.5.387%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F11570653%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1037/0278-6133.20.5.387&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=11570653&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febnurs%2F5%2F2%2F47.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000170929600009&link_type=ISI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".