MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154725769 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2013-0567

Thin film uncooled microbolometers based on plasma deposited materials

2014· article· en· W2154725769 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Andrey Kosarev, Alfonso Torres, Mario Moreno, Roberto Ambrosio

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTransition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsResponsivityPlasma-enhanced chemical vapor depositionPhysicsChemical vapor depositionPlanarOptoelectronicsFabricationDark currentMaterials scienceOpticsPhotodetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We make a summary of our research and development efforts made about microbolometers (MBs) based on plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) materials, like noncrystalline semiconductors that provide high temperature coefficient of resistivity values, in conjunction with SiO x and SiN x dielectrics used for thermoisolation, which, together with micromachining, are paving new ways for fabrication of MBs, making them promising for 2D imagers in both infrared and tera-Hertz regions. We studied a-Si:H(B), a-Ge:H, a-GeSi:H, and polymorphous p-Ge:H, p-SiGe:H as thermosensing materials (TSMs) for MBs in “bridge” configuration with “planar” and “sandwich” electrodes. This allows placing the read-out circuitry under the bridge, improving use of pixel area. PECVD SiN x films were used as both a support layer and as a coating for improving the response for λ = 8–12 μm. 2D modeling revealed both linear and super linear response to IR intensity. Voltage responsivity R U = (1.2–7) × 10 5 V/W is observed in both “planar” and “sandwich” MBs. The latter shows current responsivity R I = 0.3–14 A/W higher by about three orders of magnitude than the former. A key issue for any detector is the detectivity. Different TSMs show different noise characteristics. Noise in “sandwich” MBs is several orders of magnitude higher than that in “planar” structures. The best parameters observed with TSM Ge-Si:H are: R U = 7.2 × 10 5 V/W, R I = 14 A/W voltage and current detectivities [Formula: see text] = 8 × 10 9 cm Hz 1/2 W −1 and [Formula: see text] = 4 × 10 9 cm Hz 1/2 W −1 . Junction structures on top of the “bridge” are also discussed. Finally we describe some reported applications of MBs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicTransition Metal Oxide NanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207