Correlations among Yield, Taste, Tuber Characteristics and Mineral Contents of Potato Cultivars Grown at Different Growing Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To test expected positive impact of organic cultivation on potato tubers quality and their mineral composition, selected potato cultivars were planted in conditions of two conventional and two organic farms in central and northern Poland in 2006. Lower tuber yield and elevated levels of quality traits (including tuber flavor) were characteristics of organic locations. Cultivar by location interaction significantly affected tuber flavor. The mineral composition of tubers reflects local variation in this respect, since in organically grown tubers only P and Cu reached higher, while Mn and Cd had lower tuber concentrations. The tuber concentration of these elements strongly correlated with the tuber yield (respectively negatively and positively). For other mineral elements and quality traits correlations were rare, mostly moderate and negative. Generally, potato cultivar should be adapted to the specific growing conditions to achieve improvement of quality traits. An observed cultivar effect indicates possibility of applying breeding methods for developing cultivars with desired mineral composition of tubers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".