MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154732839 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1349760

A low-voltage current-mode instrumentation amplifier designed in a 0.18-micron CMOS technology

2004· article· en· W2154732839 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSInstrumentation amplifierLow voltageElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringAmplifierCommon-mode rejection ratioVoltageInstrumentation (computer programming)Current mirrorDifferential amplifierEngineeringFabricationMaterials scienceOperational amplifierComputer scienceTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low-voltage current-mode instrumentation amplifier designed in a 0.18 /spl mu/m CMOS process for biomedical applications is presented. The low-voltage technology chosen presented several challenges. The basic design was modified to incorporate low-voltage current mirrors and native NFETs. A common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) of 143 dB after extraction was achieved, with a differential gain of 100 V/V. Several advanced layout geometries were used to ensure proper matching between key circuit elements. The design has been submitted for fabrication to CMC to allow validation and testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.776

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207