Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses the under-representation of jazz within popular music studies and canons of popular music. It asks why a popular genre which shared so much with rock and roll—regarding its implication in American race relations, youth, leisure, mass media, etc.—came to be treated as something separate from post-war popular music. I argue that jazz’s musical and social parallels with rock and roll have been neglected because, on the one hand, jazz criticism and scholarship has been so invested in raising jazz’s status to an art music that its most commercial forms have been given little serious coverage. On the other hand, many popular music scholars have been invested in portraying rock and roll as a ‘revolutionary’ genre, and have therefore sought to show disjuncture, not parallels, with popular music from before 1950. Through this historiographical analysis, this article urges scholars to critically address the ‘received narratives’ which inform popular music studies curricula, and consider how these narratives are formed along generational, subcultural, and regional lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it