MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154739469 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.912429

Modeling the Nonlinear Context Dependency of the Neural Integrator in the Vestibuloocular Reflex

2008· article· en· W2154739469 on OpenAlexaff
W.W.P. Chan, Henrietta L. Galiana

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVestibular and auditory disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Vestibulo–ocular reflexIntegratorNonlinear systemReflexComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceNeurosciencePsychologyBiologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A neural integrator (NI) is presumed to exist in the oculomotor system to assist in numerous tasks such as maintaining gaze on imaginary targets in the dark. It is shared by all ocular reflexes including the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). It has been widely accepted that the NI acts as a "perfect" integrator even in the dark with time constants as large as 1950s. However, the NI time constant is often less than ideal and its value can also be dependent on context [W. W. P. Chan and H. L. Galiana, "Integrator function in the oculomotor system is dependent on sensory context," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 93, pp. 3709--3717, Feb. 2005.]. In this paper, a nonlinear feedback model is postulated to model the context-dependent properties of the NI. Algorithms are first developed and validated to fit both linear and nonlinear NI models to experimental data in the presence of ocular nystagmus. Preliminary results indicate that even normal subjects can have a nonlinear VOR and NI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringSame topicVestibular and auditory disordersFrench-language works237,207