MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154742968

PROBLEMS IN THE FUSION OF COMMERCIAL HIGH-RESOLUTION SATELLITE AS WELL AS LANDSAT 7 IMAGES AND INITIAL SOLUTIONS

2002· article· en· W2154742968 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistortion (music)Image fusionSatelliteComputer visionRemote sensingFusionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceImage resolutionSensor fusionHigh resolutionImage (mathematics)GeographyEngineeringTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently available image fusion techniques are not efficient for fusing the new satellite images such as IKONOS and Landsat 7. Significant colour distortion is one of the major problems. Reasons for this distortion are analyzed in this paper. A new initial automatic solution for fusing the new images is introduced. The new solution has reached an optimum fusion result – with minimized colour distortion and maximized spatial detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.536
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations176
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Fusion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207