MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154757782 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2008.4542158

A high speed word level finite field multiplier using reordered normal basis

2008· article· en· W2154757782 on OpenAlexaff
Ashkan Hosseinzadeh Namin, Huapeng Wu, Majid Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplier (economics)Computer scienceFinite fieldVery-large-scale integrationBasis (linear algebra)Permutation (music)Critical path methodWord (group theory)AdderWord lengthArchitectureArithmeticAlgorithmMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsEmbedded systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reordered normal basis is a certain permutation of a type II optimal normal basis. In this paper, a high speed design of a word level finite field multiplier using reordered normal basis is presented. Proposed architecture has a very regular structure which makes it suitable for VLSI implementation. Architectural complexity comparison shows that the new architecture has smaller critical path delay compared to other word level multipliers available in open literature at the cost of having moderately higher area complexity. The new architecture out performs all other similar proposals considering the product of area and delay as a measure of performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207