Bibliographic record
Abstract
본 연구는 협력적 신체활동 경험이 유아의 또래유능성에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위하여 충남 K시의 협력적인 신체활동에 참여한 실험집단 A유치원 만 5세 22명(남 11명, 여 10명)과 개별중심 신체활동을 실시하는 비교집단 B유치원 만 5세 22명(남 10명, 여 11명) 총 44명을 대상으로 적용하였다. 연구대상 유아들에게 10주간 동안 주당 2회 총 20번의 활동을 30분씩 실시하였다. 협력적 신체활동 경험이 유아의 또래유능성에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위하여 공변량 분석을 실시하였으며 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 협력적 신체활동 경험이 유아의 또래유능성 증진에 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 협력적 신체활동을 경험한 집단의 유아가 또래유능성의 하위 요인인 사교성, 친사회성, 주도성의 전 영역에서 비교집단의 유아에 비하여 유의미한 차이가 나타났다. 이러한 연구결과를 통해 협력적인 신체활동은 유아들이 또래들과 상호간에 원만한 친구관계를 형성해 주며 긍정적인 관계와 태도에 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 것을 알 수 있다. The purpose of thesis was to examine an effect of physical activities with peer competence for children. In this study, 44 children in the age of 5 in 2nd Kindergarten located in K city, Chungnam. The subjects were 22 children(11 boys and 10 girls) in A Kindergarten are selected in order to conduct physical activities based on cooperation and 22 children(10 boys and 11 girls) in B Kindergarten as a comparison group to implement individual-oriented physical activities. We applied the program in the total of 20 times at 30 minutes each time, and 2 times in each session for a total of 10 weeks. For peer competence tests, a measure for peer competence is used, which is developed for children. The results are as followed. firstly, the physical activity programs developed in the study on peer competence of five-year old children. secondly, Secondly, the activities improved every sub-factors of the peer competence such as sociability, pro-sociability, proactive. In addition, the study suggests a theoretical basis that can be used as practical measures of physical activity in the children. In addition, the physical activities in peer competence could build good inter-personal relationship through active interaction among the infants and lead positive impact on the development of their sociality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".