MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154759846 · doi:10.1109/icps.1991.153068

A k-step predictive scheme for speed control of diesel driven power-plants

2002· article· en· W2154759846 on OpenAlexaff
Sanjoy Roy, O.P. Malik, G.S. Hope

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)Diesel fuelModel predictive controlNonlinear systemPID controllerAdaptive controlConstant (computer programming)Voltage droopTorqueRange (aeronautics)Power (physics)Prime (order theory)Prime moverSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceEngineeringControl engineeringMathematicsControl (management)Temperature controlAutomotive engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An adaptive speed control scheme for diesel prime-movers is presented. Diesel prime-movers are characterized by nonlinear, time-varying parameters, including a nonlinear input dead-time variation that introduces an unknown delay between the injection of fuel and the production of engine torque. Such plants are difficult to control by conventional proportional-integral (PI) controllers. It is shown that by assuming the existence of an additional system time-constant, an explicit estimate of the plant parameters and dead-time can be obtained. The algorithm converges quickly. The resulting predictor can then be used to set up a k-step-ahead predictive controller. Studies are presented to compare the performance of the adaptive scheme to that of a fixed, tuned PI controller. The algorithm is shown to be flexible enough to operate under a wide range of droop settings, and equally applicable to various operating conditions.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207