Precise Error-Rate Analysis of Bandwidth-Efficient BPSK in Nakagami Fading and Cochannel Interference
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The bit-error rate (BER) of bandlimited binary phase-shift keying in a fading and cochannel interference (CCI) environment is derived for the case of perfect coherent detection. The fading-and-interference model assumed is general and of interest for microcellular system studies. The model allows both desired signal and interfering signals to experience arbitrary amounts of fading severity. A precise BER expression is derived using a characteristic function method. Using this accurate analytical result, the impact of the interfering users' fading severity on the desired user-error rate is examined. The BERs obtained under perfect coherent detection are also valid as lower performance bounds for practical realizable receivers where ideal coherent detection is difficult to implement. The error-rate performance of a novel bandwidth-efficient pulse shape is determined for the general fading and CCI environment. Analysis and numerical results show that the new pulse can provide better BER performance than the widely used raised-cosine pulse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it