Bibliographic record
Abstract
La république incarne entre autres la liberté et la souveraineté du peuple, la vertu publique, la lutte contre la corruption du pouvoir et de l'argent, l'indépendance et l'instruction du citoyen. Les auteurs de cette anthologie proposent les meilleurs discours républicains qui ont façonné l'histoire québécoise de la Nouvelle-France à la Révolution tranquille. Certains textes seront appréciés pour leur audace et leur caractère polémique, d'autres pour leur grande valeur littéraire. Ces discours fournissent des clés précieuses pour réinterpréter notre histoire nationale, ses épreuves, ses ruptures comme ses constantes. Cette anthologie présente une autre façon de lire l'histoire du Québec, au-delà des lectures courantes : fédéralistes contre souverainistes, libéraux contre conservateurs. Les républicains québécois étant d'ardents défenseurs de la souveraineté du peuple, ce livre aidera à comprendre la genèse et l'évolution de la démocratie au Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".