Financial Distress and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Configuration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The number of filings for bankruptcy procedures has exploded since 2007 and governance has been pointed outas one of the causes. We took a dataset of 312 US firms and asked the following research question: does theboard of directors configuration have an impact on financial distress? We used a matched-pair sample of USquoted firms with half of the sample filing for Chapter 7 (liquidation) or 11 (reorganization) of the United StatesBankruptcy Code and conducted logit regression analysis. We found that some board size was significantlydifferent for firms that opted for legal protection from those that did not. This study uses corporate governanceperspective to analyse the configuration of the board and its impact on a the decision of a company to resort to abankruptcy protection law. By demonstrating that corporate governance matters in terms of financial distress,this study offers guidance to shareholders and financial institutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it