Dendrimeric Oligo(phenylenevinylene)‐Extended Dithieno[3,2‐<i>b</i>:2′,3′‐<i>d</i>]phospholes—Synthesis, Self‐Organization, and Optical Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A boost from the branches: Incorporation of the dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]phosphole system as a core in oligo(phenylenevinylene) dendrimers (an example is shown here) provides materials that exhibit energy-transfer features relaying incoming photons from the dendrons towards the core, which in turn shows enhanced emission intensity. The optical properties and self-assembly features of the dendrimers can be impacted by the terminal groups (-H, -CF(3), or -NPh(2)) employed.To establish this system as a fluorescent core in pi-conjugated dendrimers, a series of oligo(phenylenevinylene) (OPV)-extended dithieno[3,2-b:2',3'-d]phospholes has been prepared by means of a Wittig-Horner protocol with a dithienophosphole dialdehyde and appropriately functionalized phosphonates. The "zero-generation" model compounds have provided the general accessibility of OPV-functionalized dithienophospholes, and show varying emission colors covering the optical spectrum from green to red. Expansion of the synthetic strategy towards the corresponding first-generation dendrimers has provided materials that show intriguing self-organization features in case of the phenyl-terminated dendrimer, forming large one-dimensional microfibres, as well as desirable energy-transfer processes from the dendrons to the dithienophoshole core resulting in an enhanced emission intensity for the latter. The present study has revealed that the terminal end-groups of the OPV branches have significant impact on the optical features of the OPV dendrimers as a whole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".