MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154847511 · doi:10.1017/s1743921307004036

New Findings Supporting the Presence of Several Distinct Structures of Circumstellar Matter in β Lyræ

2006· article· en· W2154847511 on OpenAlexaff
P. Chadima, P. Harmanec, H. Ak, O. Demirçan, S. Yang, P. Koubský, Petr Škoda, M. Šlechta, M. Wolf, H. Božić, D. Ruždjak, D. Sudar

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Astronomical Union · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersAkademie Věd České RepublikyGrantová Agentura České RepublikyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsEclipseAstrophysicsCircumstellar envelopePhysicsSpectral lineAbsorption spectroscopyAccretion discPrimary (astronomy)Accretion (finance)Absorption (acoustics)Line (geometry)AstronomyOpticsStarsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract (1) 52 photographic and 651 electronic spectra were disentangled using the program KOREL. This led to the detection of a number of weak absorption lines originating in the atmosphere of the accretion disk. So far, the detection of this disk spectrum was only reported for the Si 6347 and 6371 Å doublet. (2) The basic spectrophotometric quantities of 15 absorption lines of the primary were measured and corrected for the orbital light changes in order to eliminate the contribution of the secondary light to the observed continuum level. After the correction, a significant phase dependency of the spectral-line characteristics near the primary eclipse was detected. In all probability, another so far unknown absorption-line spectrum was thus found. This spectrum may be due to additional absorption of light of the primary in one of the jet-like structures and in the spherical gas envelope surrounding the accretion disk. Both these structures are seen projected against the primary during its eclipse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Astronomical UnionSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207