MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154852791 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4521

Critical Role for CXCR4 Signaling in Progenitor Localization and T Cell Differentiation in the Postnatal Thymus

2003· article· en· W2154852791 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jason Plotkin, Susan E. Prockop, Ana Paula Lepique, Howard T. Petrie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Cancer InstituteU.S. Public Health ServiceConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoYork UniversityMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
KeywordsProgenitor cellStromal cellBiologyCell biologyProgenitorLymphopoiesisCortex (anatomy)Cellular differentiationCXCR4ReceptorStem cellNeuroscienceChemokineCancer researchGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T cell differentiation in the thymus depends on sequential interactions between lymphoid progenitors and stromal cells in discrete regions of the cortex. Here we show that CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling is absolutely required for proper localization of early progenitors into the cortex and thus for successful steady state differentiation. All early progenitors in the thymus express CXCR4, and its ligand (CXCL12) is expressed only by stromal cells in the cortex, where early progenitors are found. Early progenitors migrate in response to CXCL12 in vitro, while thymus-specific deletion of CXCR4 in vivo results in failed cortical localization and developmental arrest. These findings indicate a crucial and nonredundant role for CXCR4 in facilitating localization of early lymphoid progenitors to tissue regions of the thymus, where lineage commitment and proliferation are controlled.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations232
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207