MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154877663 · doi:10.1109/iri-05.2005.1506476

Hybrid approach for predicting the behavior of web users

2005· article· en· W2154877663 on OpenAlexaff
Darren Ming-Shan Kao, Tansel Özyer, Reda Alhajj

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHypertextCluster analysisConstruct (python library)Web navigationWeb pageInformation retrievalWorld Wide WebRepresentation (politics)Mode (computer interface)Data miningHuman–computer interactionMachine learningProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hybrid approach for predicting the behavior of Web users in this paper, we propose the design and implementation of a hybrid system by combining several data mining techniques to capture user's Web browsing behavior. User navigation sessions that represent the interaction with a given Website are used to construct hypertext probability grammar (HPG). The production with high probability in HPG represents the most favorable user browsing trail. The HPG results will be further used to construct N/spl times/M matrix, and a clustering algorithm are applied to extract clusters of behaviors. N-gram model is used based on the assumption that Website visitors have limited memory of what they visited before, and the choice of the next page to visit does not depend on all pages visited previously; but only the N -1 page. N-gram will not generate strong x where |x| <N -1. The history depth is essentially an application of the N-gram mode therefore; we use these two terms interchangeably. Our experiments show the user a visual representation of site visitors' browsing behaviors. The reported results demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRecommender Systems and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207