MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154913089 · doi:10.33137/rr.v36i3.8652

Travel and Ethnology in the Renaissance: South India through European Eyes, 1250-1625

2000· article· en· W2154913089 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joan‐Pau Rubiés, Alan G. Arthur

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Maritime and Colonial Histories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrientalismHumanismIdolatryPoliticsPortugueseEmpireEthnographyHistoryAncient historyReligious studiesClassicsArtPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

textual object, Dickens's Great Expectations.Instead, it flirts with fragments of all these subjects without coming close to identifying any but the most amorphous social vision in any of them.While in its own terms this avoidance of closure represents a certain kind of achievement, in the end it comes across as an elegiac one -an unspoken testimony to the unrealized ambitions of the New Historicism itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.012
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesFrench-language works237,207