MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154917267 · doi:10.7202/030589ar

Le silence sourd

2005· article· fr· W2154917267 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michel Poizat

Bibliographic record

VenueProtée · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilenceHumanitiesArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le silence est systématiquement associé à la situation du sourd (sourd de naissance, dit « muet ») pour de bonnes et de mauvaises raisons. Pour de mauvaises raisons car la réalité de la situation du sourd est loin de pouvoir être qualifiée de « silencieuse ». Mais aussi pour de bonnes raisons: le sourd fait en quelque sorte résonner chez l’entendant un certain silence suscitant particulièrement le rapport du corps au signifiant, faisant valoir le silence comme présence pulsionnelle du corps dans une énonciation langagière et donc comme présentification pulsionnelle de la voix. Paradoxalement, c’est aussi le rapport de la musique au silence qui s’en trouve éclairé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProtéeSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207