MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154959666 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450810353

Oxidation of Tetrachloroethylene in a Bubble Column Photochemical Reactor Applying the UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Technique

2003· article· en· W2154959666 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dzevo Alibegic, Satoshi Tsuneda, Akira Hirata

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced oxidation water treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetrachloroethyleneChemistryMass transferReaction rate constantBubble column reactorAnalytical Chemistry (journal)KineticsMass transfer coefficientBubbleAbsorption (acoustics)PhotochemistryChromatographyMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryGas bubble

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mass transfer of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) gas, followed by a free‐OH radical reaction in the liquid phase, was studied in a bubble column reactor equipped with a UV light source and containing aqueous H2O2 as the reacting medium. Degradation of PCE in the liquid phase was found to follow pseudo‐first‐order kinetics, and the optimal ratio of H2O2/PCE leading to the highest oxidation rate could be successfully obtained from the analysis of the steady‐state OH radical concentration. Absorption of PCE gas was in the kinetic slow regime and could be predicted based on the ratio of the apparent rate constant of PCE liquid degradation to the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kapp/KLa). The presence of small amounts of PCE in the liquid bulk had positive effect on the mass transfer over the range studied and need to be taken into account.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced oxidation water treatmentFrench-language works237,207