Le partenariat entre les écoles secondaires et les musées: points de vue d'enseignants de la région de Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à faire le point sur les perceptions et les intérêts des enseignants concernant le partenariat entre les musées et les écoles secondaires. Un questionnaire a été distribué dans 16 écoles francophones de la région de Montréal. Les répondants (N = 202) se différencient selon le sexe, l'ancienneté, la matière, l'ordre d'enseignement. La plupart des enseignants reconnaissent le rôle éducatif des musées dans le développement et l'apprentissage des 12-17 ans. Toutefois, le manque d'information sur ce qu'offrent les musées et les difficultés d'organisation des sorties sont les principaux éléments relevés pour expliquer la faible utilisation des musées. Les résultats sont discutés en lien avec les écrits recensés et les initiatives récentes prises au Québec en matière d'éducation et de culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".