MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154980236 · doi:10.1109/pes.2006.1708944

The hybrid power flow controller - a new concept for flexible AC transmission

2006· article· en· W2154980236 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2006 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersShunt (medical)Network topologyTopology (electrical circuits)AC powerControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceVoltage sourceVoltageElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, two such topologies are presented. The first one consists of a shunt connected controllable source of reactive power, and two series connected voltage-sourced converters - one on each side of the shunt device. The second topology is a dual of the first; it is based on two shunt connected current-sourced converters around a series connected reactive compensator. In both cases the converters can exchange active power through a common DC circuit. Since both topologies make use of converters in addition to the (presumably existing) passive components, they can be regarded as hybrid, and the resulting FACTS controllers are thus named "hybrid power flow controllers", or HPFC. The analysis carried out that the HPFC offers performance characteristics similar to those of the UPFC. This paper presents some of the results. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The HPFC topology that employs series VSCs is introduced. The steady state analysis is given and operating characteristics are derived. The dual topology, based on shunt connected current-sourced converters is presented

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it