MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154999182 · doi:10.14740/jcgo.v3i3.283

A Case of Complete Urorectal Septum Malformation Sequence: Successful Vesicoamniotic Shunting for Obstructive Uropathy

2014· article· en· W2154999182 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yoshiaki Maseki, Sayako Ikeda, Atsuko Okazaki, Kentaro Miyazaki, Kana Kihira, Madoka Furuhashi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstructive uropathyMedicineHypoplasiaGestationSurgeryShuntingFetusUrinary systemAnatomyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complete urorectal septum malformation (URSM) sequence is a severe malformation affecting the urinary, genital and alimentary tracts. It is highly lethal due to severe renal dysfunction and pulmonary hypoplasia. Here we present a case of complete URSM sequence, where vesicoamniotic shunts were placed during midtrimester for obstructive uropathy. A 29-year-old woman was found to have a fetal abdominal cyst at 10 +6 weeks of gestation. Obstructive uropathy was diagnosed and a vesicoamniotic shunt was placed at 14 +3 and 20 +0 weeks of gestation. Subsequent ultrasound findings were suggestive of URSM sequence. The infant was delivered by cesarean section at 34 +6 weeks of gestation, and complete URSM sequence was diagnosed after birth. Obstetricians should be attentive to the possibility of complete URSM sequence when prominently dilated lower abdominal cyst is detected by ultrasonography. This case is indicative of the usefulness of vesicoamniotic shunting for obstructive uropathy of complete URSM sequence. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2014;3(3):117-120 doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcgo283w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicUrological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207