MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

European pond turtles (Emys orbicularis) as alternative dispersers of “water-dispersed” waterlily (Nymphaea alba)

2007· article· en· W2155013023 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
María Calviño‐Cancela, César Ayres Fernández, Adolfo Cordero Rivera

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationBiologyTurtle (robot)Biological dispersalDarknessColonizationSeed dispersalBotanyEcologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nymphaea alba (white waterlily) is an aquatic plant adapted to dispersal by water. This study assesses the potential of Emys orbicularis (European pond turtle) to disperse seeds undamaged and to contribute to dispersal between isolated water bodies, which cannot be achieved by the standard hydrochorous mode of dispersal. We investigated the effect of seed passage through the turtles' digestive tract on seed viability and germination over a 2-y period. The effect of gut passage differed between seeds germinated in light and in darkness. In light, gut passage delayed germination, both within the first year and between years, but total germination at the end of the study did not differ from that of control seeds. In darkness, gut passage delayed germination within the first year, but accelerated it in the long term, and total germination was higher than that for control seeds. Emys orbicularis can be regarded as a legitimate disperser of Nymphaea alba. The turtles move between different water bodies and can disperse seeds when they do so, which is essential for the colonization or re-colonization of isolated water bodies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcoscienceSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207