MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155055349 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030454

Criteria for Drugs Used in Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Trials against HIV Infection

2006· review· en· W2155055349 on OpenAlexaff
Inge Derdelinckx, Mark A. Wainberg, Joep M. A. Lange, Andrew Hill, Yasmin Halima, Charles A. Boucher

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Medicine · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalMcGill University
FundersGilead SciencesGlaxoSmithKlineEuropean CommissionBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicinePre-exposure prophylaxisMicrobicides for sexually transmitted diseasesMicrobicideTransmission (telecommunications)CondomPsychological interventionHIV vaccineTreatment as preventionPost-exposure prophylaxisSexual transmissionAbstinenceEnvironmental healthIntervention (counseling)Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Intensive care medicineImmunologyPopulationMen who have sex with menViral loadAntiretroviral therapyPsychiatrySyphilisVaccine trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors formulate criteria for an optimal pre-exposure prophylaxis drug candidate, and evaluate existing antiviral drug classes for their suitability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.064
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.170
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0640.170
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.011
Bibliometrics0.0200.016
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS MedicineSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207