Le Québec et l’intégration continentale : un processus à plusieurs vitesses et à directions multiples
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les processus actuels d'intégration continentale en Amérique du Nord posent aux Québécois la question de leur appartenance territoriale. Historiquement, les géographes ont interprété la territorialité canadienne comme résultant des tensions entre deux champs d'interaction, l'un est-ouest, l'autre sud-nord. Selon la conjoncture, un des deux champs dominerait l'autre. L'article examine d'abord cette interprétation en explicitant la notion d'interaction spatiale. Ceci débouche sur une hypothèse empirique testée à l'aide de données préliminaires sur trois types d'interaction spatiale: les échanges de biens, les flux de passagers aériens et les images télévisuelles. Il appert que la continentalisation des champs d'interaction prend des formes différentes pour chaque type d'interaction, ce qui peut avoir des conséquences pour la territorialité québécoise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".