MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155107675 · doi:10.1109/icc.2004.1312622

TCOFDM symbols detection : joint channel estimation and decoding

2004· article· en· W2155107675 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Lassaad Ammari, François Gagnon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbo codeTurbo equalizerComputer scienceDecoding methodsEstimatorMinimum mean square errorMaximum a posteriori estimationAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)TurboDetectorBit error rateOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingJoint (building)Concatenated error correction codeMathematicsMaximum likelihoodBlock codeStatisticsTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the detection of turbo coded symbols in orthogonal frequency division multiplexed (OFDM) systems and propose a turbo detector composed of a turbo decoder and a channel estimator. These modules perform jointly and exchange a soft information through an iterative process. The decoder consists of the maximum a posteriori MAP-BCJR algorithm and the channel estimator is based on the minimum mean square error (MMSE) criterion. The proposed approach allows for the use of all available information, increases the quality of channel estimation and improves the system performance. Simulation results for rate 1/3 turbo code show the efficiency of the proposed detector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207