MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155125331 · doi:10.1109/pac.1997.749942

Beam dynamics studies on the ISAC RFQ at TRIUMF

2002· article· en· W2155125331 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsBeam (structure)Tracking (education)Linear particle acceleratorNuclear physicsParticle acceleratorOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An 8 m long split-ring RFQ linac is being constructed at TRIUMF as part of the ISAC radioactive beam project. The RFQ is designed to accelerate unstable nuclei with q/A/spl ges/1/30 from 2 keV/u to 150 keV/u. Several unusual beam dynamics studies have been pursued during the latter stages of the design. To furnish engineering alignment tolerances, particle tracking in the 10-term potential was performed to estimate the RFQ performance with respect to vane displacement errors; the results are compared with a simple analytical model. In order to explore fringe field effects, particle tracking studies through computed three-dimensional fields at the RFQ entrance and exit were made to optimize the radial matching section (RMS) to the LEBT optics, and to appraise the value of a transition cell. In this paper we describe the methods and results of the beam dynamics simulations and summarize final specifications for the RFQ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it