Rotary Power Flow Controller modeling for dynamic performance evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a model suitable to performance analysis of a rotary power flow controller (RPFC), which operates in a two lines power system corridor. The RPFC consists of two transformers (one series and one shunt), and two rotary phase-shifting transformers operating in standstill. The shunt and series transformers, and the two rotary phase-shifting transformers are represented by the conventional equivalent circuit of a two winding transformer. The rotor windings of these rotary phase-shifting transformers are connected in parallel while their stator windings are in series. The resulting equipment is the rotary power flow controller which macroscopic model is proposed. The model involves a series branch consisting of an adjustable voltage source (with its internal impedance) and a shunt branch consisting of a current source. The obtained RPFC model with the regulators, implemented in SPS/Matlab, is used to show that the RPFC can maintain the power transit over the given power corridor when one of the two lines is out of service.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".