Response of anchors to variations in displacement-based loading
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of an experimental investigation on the effect of variations in displacement-based loading on the pullout capacity of anchors are presented. A single-pitch, screw helical anchor was used in the testing. The tests were conducted in dry, well-graded, dense, medium, and loose sands with relative densities of 79, 47, and 19%, respectively. Anchors were installed to, and tested at, shallow and deep depths. Measurements of ultimate pullout load and displacement at failure were made. The values of time-to-failure and mean loading rate were calculated and presented. The results of this study show that variations of displacement-based loading had some effect on the pullout capacity of shallow anchors but had only a slight effect on deep anchors. For a given depth of installation and a given sand state, the ultimate pullout load of an anchor decreases with increasing loading rate. This effect was more pronounced in anchors installed to shallow depths.Key words: anchors, displacement, displacement rate, pullout capacity, strain rate, sand, foundations, uplift.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".