MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PCR for Detection of <i>cdt-III</i> and the Relative Frequencies of Cytolethal Distending Toxin Variant-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> Isolates from Humans and Cattle

2002· article· en· W2155226848 on OpenAlexaff
Clifford G. Clark, S T Johnson, Russell H. Easy, Jennifer L. Campbell, Frank G. Rodgers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytolethal distending toxinBiologyEscherichia coliGeneToxinGenotypePolymerase chain reactionMicrobiologyMolecular biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A PCR assay that uses primers whose sequences were obtained from the published sequence of the cdt-III gene was developed to determine the frequencies of the cdt-I, cdt-II, and cdt-III genes in Escherichia coli isolates from humans and animals. E. coli isolates producing cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) were infrequently detected. The cdt-I gene was preferentially detected in strains with the cnf1 gene, while the cdt-III gene was found in strains carrying the cnf2 gene. The cdt-III genotype was more prevalent in animal isolates, while the cdt-I and cdt-II genotypes were more evident in human isolates. The presence of further cdt gene variants was indicated by the presence of toxin activity in cell culture in the absence of PCR amplification of the cdt-I, cdt-II, or cdt-III gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicEscherichia coli research studiesFrench-language works237,207