MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155237015 · doi:10.1586/17512433.1.5.627

Inflammatory reactions and drug response: importance of cytochrome P450 and membrane transporters

2008· article· en· W2155237015 on OpenAlexaff
Guillaume Dumais, Mirela O. Iovu, Patrick du Souich

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDrugPharmacologyTransporterCytochrome P450ATP-binding cassette transporterBiochemistryMetabolismInternal medicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory reactions (IRs), both infectious and aseptic, downregulate numerous enzymes of cytochrome P450 (CYP) and ATP-binding cassette transporters. The mechanism involves proinflammatory cytokines and activation of transcription factors, nuclear factor-κB, CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein-β and c-myc, which bind to negative regulatory elements and/or impede the binding of nuclear receptors to promoter elements. Downregulation of CYP enzymes and transporters modulates the kinetics of a drug, resulting in increased plasma and tissue concentrations of the drug and enhanced effect and/or toxicity. Clinical trials have shown that IRs increase the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. In this article, we speculate that IRs downregulate cardiac and vascular CYP enzymes (CYP2C8/9 and CYP2J2) responsible for the formation of vasorelaxant products. Patients with IRs should be advised that the risk of drug adverse effects and of cardiovascular diseases is increased; therefore, the benefit-risk ratio and use of drugs with narrow therapeutic index should be revaluated, as well as the conditions precipitating cardiovascular events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Clinical PharmacologySame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207