MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155242779 · doi:10.1128/jb.01707-06

Characterization of <i>Sinorhizobium meliloti</i> Triose Phosphate Isomerase Genes

2007· article· en· W2155242779 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathan J. Poysti, Ivan J. Oresnik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bacteriology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLegume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSinorhizobium melilotiBiologyTriosephosphate isomeraseIsomeraseGeneBiochemistryGeneticsPhosphateBacterial proteinMicrobiologyMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Tn5 mutant strain of Sinorhizobium meliloti with an insertion in tpiA (systematic identifier SMc01023), a putative triose phosphate isomerase (TPI)-encoding gene, was isolated. The tpiA mutant grew more slowly than the wild type on rhamnose and did not grow with glycerol as a sole carbon source. The genome of S. meliloti wild-type Rm1021 contains a second predicted TPI-encoding gene, tpiB (SMc01614). We have constructed mutations and confirmed that both genes encode functional TPI enzymes. tpiA appears to be constitutively expressed and provides the primary TPI activity for central metabolism. tpiB has been shown to be required for growth with erythritol. TpiB activity is induced by growth with erythritol; however, basal levels of TpiB activity present in tpiA mutants allow for growth with gluconeogenic carbon sources. Although tpiA mutants can be complemented by tpiB, tpiA cannot substitute for mutations in tpiB with respect to erythritol catabolism. Mutations in tpiA or tpiB alone do not cause symbiotic defects; however, mutations in both tpiA and tpiB caused reduced symbiotic nitrogen fixation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of BacteriologySame topicLegume Nitrogen Fixing SymbiosisFrench-language works237,207